Dentistry and Maxillofacial

USE OF BIOMATERIALS AT POST-EXTRACTION SITES: CLINICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL OUTCOMES

2018
Author : Danilo A. Di Stefano

Comparison of clinical and histological results at post-extraction sites with two different biomaterials.

The sheet describes the results of a retrospective study concerning 46 patients, aged between 43 and 75, who were rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses. The patients underwent non-traumatic extraction of one or more teeth: the post-extraction sockets received EDEB (enzyme-deantigenic equine bone, Osteoplant Osteoxenon, Bioteck) or ABB grafts (anorganic bovine bone – Bio-Oss, Geistlich). In both groups, the post-extraction sites were protected with the Biocollagen membrane. The data confirm that, even in post- extraction sockets, the remodeling kinetics of EDEB are faster than those of ABB, allowing the formation of a larger quantity of newly-formed bone in the same amount of time.

PRODUCTS USED: Osteoxenon Granules Mix, Biocollagen Membrane 

Bioteck Dental Surgery Sheets, Bioteck Academy Sheets
Logo Bioteck Academy


Vicenza
Headquarter
via E. Fermi, 49
36057 Arcugnano, Vicenza (VI) - Italy
Tel. +39 0444 289366
Fax: +39 0444 285272


Contact us


Torino
Multi-function production center
Via G. Agnelli, 3
10020 Riva presso Chieri, Torino (TO) - Italy

Copyright © 2022 Bioteck S.p.A. - Privacy Policy - Cookie Policy